Appendix III
Table 1. Traditional Agriculture Paradigm*
|
Ontology |
Epistemology |
Methodology |
|
Traditional agriculture varies from culture to culture, from region to region, sometimes from tribe to tribe within a culture and a region. It is often a complex, living and dynamic web of relationships, in which: |
The traditional practitioner stands in relationship to farming that is characterized by customs, rituals, generational wisdoms, tribal rules, superstitions, religious mores and often other external values. |
The traditional practitioner practices often rote patterns of seasonal preparations, planting, cultivation, and harvesting based on convention handed by parents, tribal elders and consistent with customs. |
|
the earth is a living being within a living universe; |
Innovations are not continually sought out and typically are slow in acceptance. |
|
|
forces are at work in all that is both animate and inanimate; |
Biodiversity is part of the traditional practices, stemming from the farmer's need for self-sufficiency with as much variety as possible. |
|
|
celestial rhythms play a role in health and prosperity; |
||
|
animals and humans are an integral part of the whole |
||
|
the farm is not considered a distinct being; and |
||
|
although these elements form a whole, the image of health is not necessarily discernable |
Table 2. Industrial Agriculture Paradigm*
|
Ontology |
Epistemology |
Methodology |
|
Industrial agriculture is an economic enterprise aimed at maximum short-term profit based on the most efficient use of resources and maximization of labor and technological efficiencies, in which: |
The industrial practitioner stands in an exploitative business relationship with the "factory" farm. Observation, analysis and policy decisions are made on a bottom line basis. |
The industrial practitioner is successful to the extent that economic profit is maximized. Consequently, methods and practices that lead to efficiencies of technology and labor are employed, assessed, and refined. |
|
the earth is a relatively unlimited source of exploitable resources; |
A technological framework shapes and restrains the thinking, problem identification and analysis of the practitioner. |
Innovations are constantly sought out, but evaluated on the basis of their contribution to added profit from the business enterprise; which may come from increased output or decreased input. |
|
substances are analyzed for a mechanical/manipulative use; |
Biodiversity is seen to be economically inconsistent with efficiency. Monocrop production is the rule in the industrial paradigm. |
|
|
the influences of natural conditions are limited by technology; |
||
|
animals and humans are seen in the context of output of cash flow; and |
||
|
the farm is often seen as a machine or "factory" (mechanical perspective) |
Table 3. Organic Agriculture Paradigm*
|
Ontology |
Epistemology |
Methodology |
|
Organic agriculture recognizes life as a complex ecosystem in which: |
The organic practitioner stands in a benevolent appreciation of the complexity of the ecosystem and attempts to work within the framework of this ecosystem towards sustainability (zero-sum net gains or losses). |
The organic practitioner seeks a sustainable subsistence, and restricts his/her activities to non-exploitative practices that "do no harm," and thus that support ongoing sustainability. |
|
nature, on earth, is a living ecosystem; albeit purely material; |
Organic production does not emphasize biodiversity as an essential principle, and monocrop production is common. |
|
|
substances are analyzed for balanced, ecological use; |
||
|
natural conditions are accepted and adjusted to; |
||
|
domestic animals are often excluded for ethical values; and |
||
|
the farm is seen as an integral part of larger ecosystem (ecological perspective) |
Table 4. Biodynamic Agriculture Paradigm*
|
Ontology |
Epistemology |
Methodology |
|
Biodynamics is a complex living and dynamic (spiritual) system of agriculture, in which: |
The biodynamic practitioner stands in both a supportive and remedial relationship to this complex, living, dynamic farm individuality**. |
From the diagnostic-therapeutic relationship follows that the biodynamic practitioner's activities are divided into supportive (preventative) maintenance and remedial (therapeutic) inteventions. |
|
the earth is a living being in a living universe, characterized by a spiritual-physical matrix; |
Observation, diagnosis and therapy development are the central themes of the practitioner's relationship with the farm. |
In practice, there is a strong focus on balance, biodiversity, and plant and animal immunity. |
|
substances are carriers of forces that create life; |
||
|
celestial rhythms directly effect terrestrial life; |
||
|
animals and humans emancipate from celestial rhythms; and |
||
|
the farm is a living, dynamic, spiritual individuality** (spiritual perspective) |
* Lorand, Andrew Christopher. 1996. Biodynamic Agriculture A Paradigmatic Analysis. The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Agricultural and Extension Eduation. PhD Dissertation. 114 p.
** Where Lorand uses the terminology of Steiner = individuality, other authors instead use the term organism.
Back to Biodynamic Farming & Compost Preparation