Sign up for the
Weekly Harvest Newsletter!

Published every Wednesday, the Weekly Harvest e-newsletter is a free Web digest of sustainable agriculture news, resources, events and funding opportunities gleaned from the Internet. See past issues of the Weekly Harvest.
Sign up here

Sign up for the Weekly Harvest Newsletter

What Is Sustainable Agriculture?

Master Publication List

Search Our Databases

Urban Agriculture

Energy Alternatives

Beginning Farmer

Field Crops

Horticultural Crops

Livestock & Pasture

Local Food Systems

Food Safety

Marketing, Business & Risk Management

Organic Farming

Pest Management

Soils & Compost

Water Management

Ecological Fisheries and Ocean Farming

Other Resources

Sign Up for The Dirt E-News

Home Page

Contribute to NCAT


Newsletter sign up button

· Privacy Policy · Newsletter Archives

RSS Icon XML Feeds

RSS 2.0: Events, Breaking News, Funding Opportunities Atom: Events, Breaking News, Funding Opportunities


NCAT strives to make our information available to everyone who needs it. If you are a limited-access or low-income farmer and find that one of our publications is just not in your budget, please call 800-346-9140.


How are we doing?


Home  > Question of the Week

Question of the Week

Permalink Can mustard oil be used as a soil fumigant?


Answer: A search of the Internet reveals a good deal of ongoing research on this subject in the U.S., Bangladesh, and Australia. Oil of yellow mustard is being proposed as a replacement for the soil fumigant methyl bromide. A 1997 patent application for one broad-spectrum formulation lists mustard oil, natural capsaicin sources, and lemon extracts as ingredients (see Resources). It does not appear that this method is in wide use yet.

In a joint project involving American researchers but carried out in Bangladesh, mustard oil cake was used in suppression of soil-borne diseases in vegetable crops. (Cake is a by-product of the edible mustard oil industry, as the oil is widely used for cooking in South Asia.) The Resources section lists reports on research involving tomatoes, cucumbers, and okra.

Funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, the University of Idaho Cooperative Extension is conducting a comprehensive investigation of mustard oils as biofuel and as an organic pesticide to displace chemicals such as methyl bromide. The project Web site lists their goals for The Mustard Project, which began in March 2002, as:

• To produce at least 6 billion gallons of mustard oil biodiesel
• At a cost of about $1.00/gal. (using 10 cent per lb. mustard oil)
• To displace synthetic pesticide chemicals with safer organic compounds

Field trials of oil from the improved varieties began in 2003 on potatoes, strawberries, foliage, and nursery trees. The pesticide registration process was begun in 2002. Varieties of yellow mustard were selected for high glucosinolate content, high yield, good agronomic character (including drought tolerance), and character consistent with biodiesel use. For more information, see

Also see John H. Bowers and James C. Locke. 2004. Effects of formulated plant extracts and oils on population density of Phytophthora nicotianae. Soil Plant Disease. January. p. 11–16. Materials tested by Bowers and Locke were active against a wide range of greenhouse fungi, depending on how treatments were formulated.

The Pesticide Action Network (PAN) has a useful on-line pesticide database. This provides statistics on California use of oil of mustard and shows that the first field trials were beginning in 2003 as a soil pre-plant treatment and in nursery (landscape) production.

Additional research on mustard oil as a nematicide is being carried out at Auburn University in Alabama. Reports from the Auburn Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology are listed under Resources.

For additional information on mustard oil as a methyl bromide replacement, see


Champon, Louis S., and John H. Oltman. 1998. International Application under the Patent Cooperation Agreement. Images, Description. 9 p.

Karim, Anwar, S.A. Khan, A. Rahman, Mahbubur Rahman, A.N.M. Rezaul Karim, A. Baltazar, S. Miller, and S.K. De Datta. 2002. Integrated Management of Soil-borne Diseases and Weeds in Okra. 2 p.

McGuire, Andy. 2003. Mustard. Washington State University Cooperative Extension. 3 p.

PAN Pesticides Database. 2003. California Pesticide Use—Oil of Mustard. 4 p.

Rahman, M.A., Iqbal Faruk, M.A. Kader, H.S. Jasmine, A.N.M. R. Karim, L. Black, and S. Miller. 2002. Management of Soil-borne Pathogens in Tomato and Cucumber. 3 p.

Rodriguez-Kabana. 2000. Abstract: Nematicidal and Herbicidal Properties of Furfural-based Biofumigants. Auburn University, Auburn, AL. 1 p.

Rodriguez-Kabana. 2000. Abstract: Comparative Study on the Nematicidal Activities of Garlic and Mustard Oils. Auburn University, Auburn, AL. 1 p.



Permalink Can you recommend an approved substitute for latex paint for the trunks of young trees interplanted in a certified organic orchard?


The following is a list of possible alternatives for you:

- Lime whitewash made from calcium carbonate. Sources include oystershell flour, dolomite (not slaked), aragonite and mined limestone.

- Kaolin Clay (Surround WP Crop Protectant), the product used to confuse codling moth from laying eggs on treated fruit. It is a clay that leaves a whitish-gray residue; maybe enough to reflect the sunlight and keep the trunk insulated.

- Plastic coils used as rabbit guards. Note that these only cover the main trunk and not the branches.

- Crepe paper tree wrap sold in garden centers and nurseries. Wrap the trees with this paper, fasten with tape to insulate the tree, and remove in the spring.



Permalink Is whey a good feed for hogs, and should it be supplemented with another feed?


The resources listed below offer several sources of information dealing with feeding whey to hogs. They provide specific information on using liquid whey as an ingredient in hog rations, as well as information on using liquid feed (containing whey) and liquid feeders. Two of the articles discuss possible problems in feeding pigs whey, including gastric ulceration and other health problems. The feed value of whey is referenced in two of the listed resources, to help formulate rations to meet hog nutrient requirements.

The answer to your question on whether whey has to be supplemented with grain is yes. Most of these publications discuss using various types of grain products.

One of the resources listed below, an archived e-mail from Sergio Piccinini, addresses whey-feeding of pigs to produce specific products. Mr. Piccinini writes about swine production in Italy. He states that the Large White breed is better than the indigenous breed of black-coated pigs in their whey-fed production practices. His letter suggests that Parma and San Daniele hams are produced using a whey-diet. Meanwhile, the reference from the Food Network Encyclopedia states that Parma ham is produced by hogs eating a chestnut and whey diet. An article abstract from Scandinavia addresses hog carcass quality of whey-fed hogs.

The section from Feeds and Feeding is from the 1951 edition and seems to suggest that whey from Swiss cheese might have a higher value than whey from American or Cheddar cheese factories.


Anon. 1975. Feeding liquid whey in swine fattening rations. North Dakota State University, Dickinson Research Extension Center. 3 p.

Anon. 2005. Swine diseases (Intestines) – Gastric (Stomach) Ulceration. Iowa State University, College of Veterinary Medicine. 4 p.

Anon. No date. Utilization of liquid whey as fodder. 1 p.

Braun, K., R. Friendship, and C.F.M. de Lange. No date. Microbiology of liquid feed and feed ingredients. University of Guelph. 1 p.

Brooks, Peter H., and Jane D. Beal. 2004. Liquid feeding of pigs: Implications for pig and human health. University of Plymouth, UK. 11 p.

Drocher, W. 1990. Intestinal syndrome of absent fermentation in swine after liquid feeding of easily-fermentable components. 1 p.

Food Network. 1995. Parma ham. Encyclopedia. 2 p.,7770,3223,00.html

Feedstuffs. 2005. Whey, liquid. Feedstuffs Reference Issue & Buyers Guide. 1 p.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. No date. Milk by-products, skim milk, butterfat, whey. 4 p.

Hullberg, Anja, et al. 2003. Effects of sex, feed and pre-slaughter routines on technological meat quality in carries and non-carriers of the RN allele. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Sept. 1 p.

Illingworth, Clare. 2005. Liquid feeding takes hold in Ontario. Ontario Pork Newsletter. April. 5 p.

de Lange, C.F.M. 2005. Liquid feeding of swine: Potential positive and negative impacts on pork safety. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs. SF601. 2 p.

Meat and Livestock Commission. 2003. General guidelines on liquid feeding for pigs. 12 p.

Morrison, Frank B. 1951. Whey for swine. In: Feeds and Feeding: A Handbook for the Student and Stockman. The Morrison Publishing Company, Ithaca, NY. p. 590-593.

Murphy, Janice. 2003. Comparative feed values for swine. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs. 7 p.

National Research Council. 1983. Animal By-Products: Dairy Whey. In: Underutilized Resources as Animal Feedstuffs. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. p. 28-30.

Piccinini, Sergio. 1998. Subject: feeds. 2 p.

Wallace, Jeanine. 2005. New liquid feeding system means healthier pigs, lower costs. Pigs, Pork & Progress.



Permalink What organic controls are there for fruit flies?



First, I would urge you to contact Neil Miller, who works with the USDA's Agricultural Research Service (ARS) researching fruit fly management. He has been working with many organic growers on the big island to help them manage fruit flies. His contact information is:
Agricultural Science Research Technician (insects)
Phone: (808) 959-4302
Fax: (808) 959-5470
920 Stainback Highway
Hilo, HI 96720

As you are aware, fruit fly control is very difficult, although there are some new products that can be effective. A first step in any pest-management program is to correctly identify the pest, so please collect some adults and have them correctly identified, or collect some infested fruit and rear out the adults to obtain a positive identification. Once this is done, insights into possible management strategies can be gleaned from examining the insect's life cycle. There are dozens of species of fruit flies, each with a range of preferred hosts and a unique set of behaviors. For example, one of the reasons that a new commercial fruit fly bait (GF 120) is effective against the melon fruit fly is the fact that the adult fly overnights and forages away from the host crop in which it lays its eggs. This can be seen as a "weak link" in its behavior that a management strategy can take advantage of. In this case, a border crop can be planted and sprayed with the bait, and if the border is wide enough, the melon fly will feed on the bait and perish before it has a chance to lay eggs on a host crop. Knowing the host plants and crops of the pest will influence management decisions with respect to where a future crop is planted and what types of crop rotations are used. If applied control measures are needed, proper identification is critical; some control measures work well with some species of fruit fly and less well with others.

Life Cycle and Ecology
The description that follows is a generalized life cycle of fruit flies. The adult female will pierce a thin-skinned fruit (a tomato, for example) and lay one to several eggs. Other females may follow suit, depositing eggs in the same hole. A single female generally has the capacity to lay several hundred eggs over the course of her life (1). The eggs hatch in 2 to 20 days (depending on temperature) and the larvae burrow into the fruit to feed for 10 to 40 days. At this time, the larvae will be roughly ¼-inch long and will leave the fruit and pupate in the top 1 to 2 inches of soil. Adult flies will emerge in 10 to 50 days. These times are very temperature-dependent, and the whole life cycle can be completed in two and a half weeks under ideal conditions.

Fruit flies are very mobile as adults and some species are strong fliers (e.g., Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett), the melon fly). Sterile males of the medfly, Ceratitus capitata, have been found 24 miles from their release point.

Likely Species of Fruit Flies
It’s likely that one of three species is attacking your crop. The melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett), has more than 80 hosts and is a major pest of beans, bittermelon, Chinese wax gourd, cucumbers, edible gourds, eggplant, green beans, hyotan, luffa, melons, peppers, pumpkins, squashes, togan, tomatoes, watermelon, and zucchini (2). The oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel), attacks more than 300 cultivated and wild fruits including Annona (cherimoya, atemoya, sugar apple), avocado, banana, bittermelon, citrus, coffee, guava, macadamia, mango, papaya, passion fruit, peppers, persimmon, and tomato (3). This pest will apparently breed in all fleshy fruits. On Oahu it is estimated that 95% of the oriental fruit flies develop on guava, Psidium guajava L. (4). They do not attack cucurbit crops such as cucumber and squash. The last fruit fly suspect is the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann). This pest attacks more than 260 different fruits, flowers, vegetables, and nuts, with a preference for thin-skinned, ripe, succulent fruits (5).

Management Options
Once the female fruit fly has deposited eggs in the fruit, it’s too late for managing the pest. Therefore, focus should be directed at preventing egg-laying, either by mechanical means such as bagging the fruit, or by use of processed kaolin clay (known as particle film barriers), or by removing sources of adult flies (sanitation practices). Use of insecticidal baits to kill the adult female before she deposits her eggs is discussed below, but may not be acceptable under organic production guidelines.

Sanitation is important in the control of any fruit fly. All dropped and prematurely ripe fruit, as well as small fruit suspected of being infested, should be destroyed to prevent the larvae from developing into adult fruit flies. The fruit may be fed to livestock (but must be eaten before any larvae have a chance to emerge), composted in a well-managed compost pile (so the heat will destroy the larvae), or buried 2 feet below the soil surface so that adult flies will not be able to emerge.

Bagging (6): Each fruit is enclosed in an appropriately sized bag tied around the fruit stem. Alternatively, newspaper of an appropriate size can be rolled to enclose the fruit, then tied both around the fruit stem and at the free end.

Bagging should begin when the fruit is small, shortly after the flower parts have fallen. This method of control is more adapted to small plantings (1 to 25 plants) than to large ones (quarter-acre or more). Although bagging the fruit is the most certain method of control it is a laborious process and requires attention at regular intervals (10 to 14 days) to keep the young fruit covered. Also, this procedure will injure some of the fruit unless they are handled carefully.

Particle Film Barrier: Surround® WP is a commercially available formulation of processed kaolin clay. There is some evidence that it can be an effective deterrent to oviposition (egg laying) by some species of fruit flies (Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata, Natal fruit fly, Ceratitis rosa, and marula fruit fly, Ceratitis cosyra, as well as the apple maggot/blueberry maggot, Rhogoletis pomonella) (7). The mode of action is hypothesized to be non-recognition of the host because of changes in the color and texture of the fruit that result from the kaolin clay application (7).

For more information about Surround, contact:
John Mosko
Marketing manager, Crop Protectants
Engelhard Corporation

Insecticides: Diatect V is a mixture of silicon dioxide (diatomaceous earth—82.45%) + pyrethrin (.5%) and is acceptable for use in organic production systems. Organic Plus, a similar premix of silicon dioxide (diatomaceous earth—83.2%) + pyrethrin (.2%) + piperonyl butoxide (1.1%), is registered for use on some fruits for control of fruit flies and other pests, but is not likely be acceptable for certified organic production due to the presence of piperonyl butoxide. Pyrellin, a premix of pyrethrin (.6%) + rotenone (.5%), is also registered for use on some fruits for control of fruit flies and other pests (8) but you should check with your certifier to see if its use is acceptable for certified organic production.

There are some new pesticides developed by Dow Ag-Chemicals, based on spinosad, that are approved for use in organic systems. Spinosad is the common name of a mixture of spinosyn A and spinosyn D, two molecules derived naturally from a bacterium through fermentation (9). Entrust is an organically approved formulation of spinosad. There is also a fruit fly bait based on the same pesticide now being marketed under the name GF120. A researcher at Washington State University found that the cherry fruit fly could be effectively controlled using a combination of a wettable powder formulation of Entrust applied at 10-day intervals, combined with use of the GF 120 bait spray. GF-120 bait treatments were applied weekly, and reapplied after rain on some of the sites.

Baits: As noted in the previous paragraph, Dow Ag-Chemicals has developed a fruit fly bait, GF120. This bait, consisting of a small amount of spinosad mixed with sugar and a protein byproduct of corn, is geared toward tropical fruit-fly species. The baits are applied to broadleaf plants that serve as a refuge for fruit-fly adults (5). Its effectiveness on various species of fruit flies is now being researched in Hawaii and other locations. Hawaii is currently involved in a fruit-fly suppression program and is using this bait as one of the tools in the effort. The Hawaiian company that will be distributing this product is United Horticultural Supplies; contact Reginald Hasegawa at 808-935-7191. The bait comes as a concentrate and when diluted according to directions is 80 parts per million (ppm) spinosad (this is equivalent to roughly .01 oz/acre deposition rate of spinosad). This bait is highly toxic to bees (9) and there is some phytotoxicity on cucumber (10). Your organic certifier can tell you whether it is acceptable for certified organic production. For more information on Hawaii’s fruit-fly suppression program, contact: Dr. Roger Vargas Areawide Suppression Program 808-959-4329 Another bait, developed under the name SureDye™, is not yet commercially available, but is reportedly in the EPA registration process (10). SureDye™ is specifically formulated for fruit flies, and is reportedly non-toxic to non-target organisms. The active ingredients are red dye #28 and yellow dye #8. Once ingested, the dyes act as poisons in the presence of light and kill the insect. Unfortunately, SureDye™ is not yet registered for commercial use. Again, your organic certifier can advise you on the acceptability of this product once it becomes available commercially. Parasitic nematodes: Another option is the use of parasitic nematodes to treat the ground around plants where fruit-fly larvae have dropped to pupate. The nematodes will attack the larvae and pupae as they tunnel into the ground. For a listing of retail suppliers of beneficial organisms, see A free copy of Suppliers of Beneficial Organisms in North America can be obtained by writing: California Environmental Protection Agency Department of Pesticide Regulation Environmental Monitoring and Pest Management Branch 1020 N. Street, Room 161 Sacramento, CA 95814-5624 References: 1) Metcalf, Flint, and Metcalf. 1962. Destructive and Useful Insects. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. p. 812-14. 2) Mau, R. F.L, and J. L. M. Kessing. 1991. Melon fly. Accessed April 2002. 3) Mau, R. F.L, and J. L. M. Kessing. 1992. Oriental fruit fly. Accessed April 2002. 4) Newell, I. M. and F. H. Haramoto. 1968. Biotic Factors Influencing Populations of Dacus dorsalis in Hawaii. Proc. Hawaiian Entomol. Soc. 20(1): 81-139. 5) Mau, R. F.L, and J. L. M. Kessing. 1992. Mediterranean Fruit Fly. Accessed April 2002. 6) Pena, J., and F. Johnson. 1998. Website. Insect Management in Papaya. 1999 Insect Management Guide, Entomology and Nematology Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Date first printed: October 1993. Revised: October 1998. 7) Mosko, John. 2002. Technical representative for Englehard Corporation. Personal communication. 8) Pena, J and F. Johnson. October 1993. Revised: October 1998. Reviewed: November 2001. Accessed April 2002. Insect Management in Guava. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service. 9) Anonymous. 1999. Spinosad: Questions and Answers. USDA Animal, Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) Accessed April 2002. 10) McQuate, Grant. 2002 personal communication. USDA ARS Tropical Fruit Research Station 11) Timothy J. Smith, Washington State University Extension, North Central Washington 300 Palouse, Wenatchee, WA 98801 (509) 667-6540; Additional reading: Prokopy, R.J., Miller, N.W., Pinero, J., Oride, L.K., Chaney, N.L., Revis, H., Vargas, R.I. 2005. How Effective Is Gf-120 Fruit Fly Bait Spray Applied To Border Area Sorghum Plants For Control Of Melon Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae)?. Florida Entomologist. 87:3. P354-360.



Question of the Week Archives